Here is my questions from each videos
Video 1
1. It is clear that why did Derrida fefuses to define the term Deconstruction, because as he says it is not possible to define something. Whereas when we look at in Science and technology every term is definable. nowadays Science is more reliable than literature. The question is that in literature can not we define something ?
2. How does Deconstruction happen on it's own is still confusing ?
Video 2
1 . It is language which speaks not man. Because meaning is a product of language. But the language is the product of man, then how does Language displace man from the center of philosophy ?
Video 3
Can we say that there are positive elements in language and for our understanding we made the negative elements ?
Video 4
What is infinite play of meaning ?
Video 6
Can't understand the third characteristic preoccupation with romanticism of Yale school of Deconstruction ?
0 Comments